WEF’s ‘Net Zero’ Agenda Will Kill Billions, Experts Warn

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for governments worldwide to comply with its globalist agenda that will reduce the global population by billions.

Leading experts have spoken out against the unelected organization’s plans and are warning the public that the WEF’s “Net Zero” goal to eliminate fossil fuels will result in the deaths of over four billion people.

The “Net Zero” target to end fossil fuel use is part of the WEF and UN’s “Agenda 2030” and “Agenda 2050” plans for humanity and involves dramatically reducing fossil reliance by 2030 and completely eliminating their use by 2050.

The WEF continues to push its agenda and has been calling for taxpayers worldwide to pay $3.5 trillion per year, which they insist is necessary to fund the noble global power in order to meet the globalist organization’s “Net Zero” goal of “decarbonizing” the planet.

However, critics argue that “decarbonization” is just a euphemism for the WEF’s anti-human agenda and experts are raising the alarm about what this will actually mean for civilization, which includes the death of over four billion people.

Starvation

Danish statistician Bjørn Lomborg is just one who has warned that ending fossil fuel use will lead to the deaths of around half of the world’s population through starvation alone.

“4 billion people are dependent on fossil fertilizer for food,” Lomborg notes.

“Without, 4 billion will starve to death.

“It is time to call out the astoundingly destructive & misanthropic campaigners,” he declared.

The article Lomborg was responding to was by British economist Neil Record in the Telegraph, who argued that the number of people that might die was closer to six billion.

Six Billion Would Die in a Year.

Neil Record reported: “If we literally just stopped using fossil fuels and “did without the natural resources on which the world, its economies and populations depend, most likely six billion people would die within a year.”

Breaking down what would happen in a world without fossil fuels, Record notes that most people would suffer blackouts due to the grid being so seriously compromised, possibly fatally, and they may be widespread and permanent.”

From day one, gas users would be the first to feel the change of no more mining of coal; the world’s oil wells shut down; the world’s gas fields likewise, and in 10 or 15 days, the UK would have to turn off its gas distribution system as it would be unable to maintain pressure.

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

In turn, the domestic supply would be shut down too – gas would stop flowing, and some 21 million households (74% of the population) would no longer have heating, hot water, and cooking facilities.

“In their panic, people might turn to electricity for their cooking and heating, but wait…” says Record, who adds, “The UK electricity grid relies on natural gas as its “buffer” energy source. Every day, demand varies according to consumer demand, and the other main energy supplier, renewables, are highly variable and can only power the grid when gas is picking up the lion’s share of the gap between their output and consumer demand.”Source

So the moment that the main gas distribution system is de-pressurised, the grid-balancing system fails and power cuts ensue.

Electricity demand would have rocketed through the switch to electric space heating, cooking, and water heating, and so it seems very likely that the sudden excess demand would be undeliverable, and therefore that the grid would spiral into uncontrollability resulting in no electricity.

This also means there would be no communication systems no mobile phones and no television.

Without power, there will be no running water and no heating and the most vulnerable people will start to die, according to Record.

Initially, this will be the elderly in their own homes, then in hospitals when the diesel backup generators run out of fuel.

Within the first 25 days, new “existential problems emerge for ordinary people in the form of food availability and distribution.” Source

Starvation Begins From Day 25 

Day 25 – By the twenty-fifth day, diesel and petrol are likely to have run dry, although, Record says that he is probably being generous with the timing here, but what this will mean is that food distribution would fail, and so as most of the population are entirely dependent on bought food they will begin to starve.

Interestingly, it will be only the isolated rural communities, and those who are agriculturally self-sufficient would be relatively unaffected.

Day 50 – Many people in urban areas would now be near death from starvation, Record claims, and “law and order would have broken down” and due to the “increasingly desperate search for the means of survival” he suspects there will have been “mass conflict and slaughter taking place.

Without the sanitary conditions that we have due to power, water supply, and sewage flow, we will see a return of Victorian diseases such as cholera and dysentery.

Day 100 – money and status will be irrelevant as time passes and just three months after the world stops oil, Neil Record, guesses that around half of the world’s population of approximately four billion, people would be dead “The first to die would be the urban poor; then the middle and upper classes”

Again, the survivors would be those in rural areas and able to live off local agricultural produce or live off dwindling food stocks.

For fifty-five percent of people in urban areas, it will be almost impossible to access food and safe water as there will be none of the normal distribution routes for food or storage facilities (chillers/freezers) without electricity, and without pumped water, clean water would be unavailable, or close to impossible to access. Source

A Year Without Oil – Murder and Mayhem.

Day 365 – after a year without oil Record says “perhaps a further two billion people would have starved or frozen to death, leaving, say, two billion left alive remaining food stocks would have been exhausted or spoiled, and the inevitable breakdown of law and order would have meant many would meet a violent end.”

“Competition for scarce resources, so elegantly solved by the invention of markets and prices, would be replaced by murder and mayhem”

There is now no going back as the means to reverse the just stop oil experiment would have gone.

“The mass extinction would have robbed societies of their cultures, education, and survival techniques. A new dark age would ensue” and as Record says this is a nightmarish scenario, but claims that everything in this scenario is well supported by fact. Source

Meadows Depopulation

Members of the WEF have repeatedly suggested that mass reductions in the number of humans on earth would help the organization reach its green agenda goals, and as Slay News has reported, Dennis Meadows who is a “celebrated member of the WEF, has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans.

Meadows, who is one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.” and an honorary member of the Club of Rome as well as a member of the World Economic Forum. argues that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

Meadow’s book was published over 50 years ago, but his ideology appears to still align with the WEF’s anti-human, depopulation agenda, of today.

He argued that “most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”

“The survivors” are a select few, however, and it is unlikely that many of us will be included. (It’s that big club again). Source

One Way or Another

Experts who have warned of the dangers associated with stopping oil should not be ignored, it is blatantly obvious that our unelected leaders are not interested in our well-being.

Those who have been promised a privileged position in the depopulated world of the future, have many ways they hope to achieve their aims, whether it be through, chemtrails, vaccines, pharma products, toxic substances in food, water, etc etc, they aim to get us, one way or another and stopping oil is just one more way.

SHARE THIS:
By Hunter Fielding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
;^)
;^)
2 months ago

YOU ARE THE CARBON THEY INTEND TO REDUCE!

I can’t help but wonder about historic parallels. Did the people of Weimar Germany ignore that looney Hitler, as we ignore the insane WEF and Klaus Schwab? Master Race? Ha! That’ll never happen. Pay no attention to the megalomaniac threatening to “conquer the world.” Impossible. Too silly to be scary.
We all know what happened. Could alert Germans have stopped Adolph BEFORE his reign of terror?
I believe the world is facing an even more dangerous and crazy nemesis…the WEF! And here we are, chuckling while we read of Klaus Schwab’s ideas for the future! Too silly! No, it isn’t!
The WEF has “people” in most countries of consequence! Trudeau in Canada, Obama in the US…and Australia and New Zealand are following the dictates of these madmen!
These nations are autonomous no longer. Agents of the globalists are leading us now! We blame Biden or Obama for open borders and chaos. We can’t understand why things have suddenly become so authoritarian and contrary to our nation’s traditions. Here’s the answer…the World Economic Forum! Our leaders no longer care about the people. They are vying for Princehood in the New World Order. They are in lockstep with this vile, Elitist agenda!
Will the people in the 2020s realize what is happening and correct it in time, unlike the Germans who succumbed to Hitler?
There is a huge difference between the two examples. Hitler wanted to RULE the people of the world…Klaus Schwab intends to KILL 80% of Earth’s human beings! Whose ideology is more dangerous?
So why aren’t plans being made to end THIS reign of terror, before it’s too late? The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Major Kong
Major Kong
2 months ago
Reply to  ;^)

WWII may have ended Germany’s 3rd Reich in 1945 but the 4th Reich was born at the end of that war as we see what is happening today….The WEF along with WHO, NATO, Gates and Fauci are the 4th Reich…

PithyKat
PithyKat
2 months ago
Reply to  Major Kong

Don’t forget biden, harris, soros, obama, kerry, newsome, pelosi, most if not all demoncRATS and most politicians.

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
2 months ago

But that’s the INTENT! The global population can only be a total of 500 million, in their warped views! Note none of them are selling up to volunteer to be the 1st to die, to reduce the excess population…

PithyKat
PithyKat
2 months ago

What country is this nazi from – that’s where he should start his killing spree – take out a few billion there including (specifically) his DNA origins.

Ricco
Ricco
2 months ago

Putin has called Schwab and other WEF leaders legitimate military targets.

He is right. Musk threw me off Twitter for suggesting that these criminals be brought to justice. Inciting violence is what he calls legal prosecutions resulting in capital punishment.

Yet a genocidal organization can speak to murdering billions – that’s ok – and he hired a WEFer to run things just before I was tossed off.

I don’t understand Musk – whose side is he on? Does he know?

Ricco
Ricco
2 months ago

Schwab son of a Nazi. Canada’s Freeland a WEF trustee a Nazis’ grand daughter. She invited a Nazi into parliament. Not a mistake – they have been working on NAZIS are better than Russians.

Had a colleague try that one on me – I laughed and said as a Jew I couldn’t get behind that idea – but even a non Jew shouldn’t believe that.

He responded Zelensky is a Jew – I asked what was the relevance of that? He said well how can a Jew associate with Nazis? Is that because, I asked, you think all Jews are the same, believe the same things – hmm where have we heard that before.

He made a hasty retreat – propaganda repeaters don’t realize we already have a head start on their BS. I swear they think their ideas are their own.

Last edited 2 months ago by Ricco
Duties
Duties
2 months ago

Globalists have packaged mass genocide as ‘battling climate change’ and people are stupid enough to believe it. When they eliminate fossil fuels to save the planet, who the hell do people think they’re saving it for when it kills half the world’s population? Wake up people! Covid, the clot shot, elimination of fossil fuels, reducing agriculture are all to rid the world of useless eaters: us!

Last edited 2 months ago by Duties
Duties
Duties
2 months ago

The elites are taking away the ability to heat our homes and grow our food. They are eliminating the means to maintain our mobility by government mandates eliminating gas powered cars while driving the cost of owning a new automobile out of reach. Savings and wages eaten up by inflation. Home ownership has evaporated as a dream for many. This on the heels of draconian lockdowns and mandated, useless and deadly vaccines in the name of an engineered virus. And fools are buying the lie that climate change is the ‘greatest existential threat to mankind.’

ThomastheTomas
ThomastheTomas
2 months ago

If this is true then why are we letting them do this to us?

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
2 months ago
Reply to  ThomastheTomas

They have waiters and maids to protect them!

Kevin Stewart Hobson
Kevin Stewart Hobson
2 months ago
Reply to  ThomastheTomas

Its ALL the worlds Governments that signed the RIO treaty in 1992. Included world de-population which most of them probably never read before it was signed.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
2 months ago

Nuke the next WEF conference in Davos! KiII’em all!

Kevin Stewart Hobson
Kevin Stewart Hobson
2 months ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

A great idea!

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x