UN Scientist Demands Mass Depopulation to ‘Stop Global Warming’

A United Nations scientist has called for billions of human beings around the world to be “culled” in order to “save the planet” from “global warming.”

UCL Professor Bill McGuire, a United Nations (UN) “agenda contributor,” warns that the only “realistic way” to “avoid catastrophic climate breakdown” was to “cull” the human population with a “high fatality pandemic.”

The statement was issued in a post on X that was subsequently withdrawn by McGuire amid an immense backlash.

However, he argues that he deleted the post because people took it the wrong way, “not because I regret it.”

McGuire was previously a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), a British government body that advised politicians on the Covid pandemic response.

He also helped author a report for the notorious Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a United Nations (UN) body that has helped drive climate policy globally despite making a slew of errors.

“If I am brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic #climate breakdown, is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate,” wrote McGuire, Professor of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London (UCL).

McGuire, who previously said the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel “is what happens when a people have nowhere else to turn,” received a slew of negative responses.

Climate change skeptics argued it was proof the climate alarmist movement is a “death cult,” more concerned with reordering society than saving lives.

“RIGHT, I AM DELETING THE INITIAL TWEET NOW,” McGuire posted in all capitals after digesting some feedback.

“NOT BECAUSE I REGRET IT,” he explained.

“BUT BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE HAVE MISTAKENLY, OR INTENTIONALLY, TAKEN IT THE WRONG WAY.”

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

He later insisted his initial post was “about suddenly falling economic [activity]” and “[n]ot people dying” — despite the fact he clearly referenced “culling the human population” and a “high fatality rate.”

Research funded by the Joe Biden regime could make McGuire’s vision of a high-mortality pandemic a reality. Peter Daszak, a researcher with ties to Anthony Fauci who was accused of being complicit in a Wuhan lab leak prior to the Covid pandemic, is still receiving millions of dollars of public funding.

His EcoHealth Alliance group still has hundreds if not thousands of coronavirus samples “in freezers in Wuhan.”

He is also sourcing exotic new bat viruses from Burma, Laos, the Philippines, Thailand, and other countries, some of which are highly pathogenic.

U.S. taxpayers are also funding highly dangerous Chinese bird flu research.

SHARE THIS:
By Hunter Fielding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
elizabethrc
elizabethrc
5 months ago

How about this, Tootsie: Eliminate the WEF personnel and then address the elimination of the leaders in the Soviet Union and China?

;^)
;^)
5 months ago

I will believe you BELIEVE in your plan…
when you blow your own brains out!
Start the “culling” yourself! Sacrifice.

Sink Chicken
Sink Chicken
5 months ago

Maybe UCL Professor Bill McGuire should lead by example?

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
5 months ago

Why not go after the REAL culprit: Hydrogen Hydroxide, instead of humans and CO2, if you must attack something? Y’all are psycho, for real!

Masseur1950
Masseur1950
5 months ago

Bill Gates started this with Fauci, the miniature lawn statuette .And they are already achieving a quite substantial result. Those guys are simply jumping on the bandwagon. Just to get some recognition from the WEF and posture for fame and fortune.

cozmik
cozmik
5 months ago

After you…dipstick.
How can anyone take what he said the wrong way…tell us what you really meant, we can’t all have got it wrong.

Last edited 5 months ago by cozmik
6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x