The Trump administration is weighing a dramatic escalation against communist Cuba that could choke off the island’s energy supply and force a political reckoning in Havana.
According to officials familiar with internal discussions, the White House is evaluating a complete halt of all oil deliveries to Cuba as part of a broader strategy aimed at triggering a transition of power.
The push for a full oil blockade is being led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other hardline officials who believe the Cuban regime is at its most vulnerable point in decades.
While no final decision has been made, the proposal is expected to be included in a list of options presented to President Donald Trump in the coming weeks.
A total oil cutoff would mark a major escalation beyond earlier efforts focused on disrupting Venezuelan exports, which historically supplied most of Cuba’s crude.
That energy lifeline has already been severely weakened following the U.S. operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, sending shockwaves through Havana.
One person briefed on the strategy described energy as the regime’s primary weakness, calling oil the chokehold needed to bring the system down.
Administration officials reportedly believe the fall of Cuba’s communist government is not hypothetical but imminent, with some describing regime change as a realistic 2026 outcome.
Any oil blockade would be carried out under the Helms-Burton Act, the 1994 law that governs U.S. restrictions on Cuban trade and financial activity.
The law provides legal authority for sweeping enforcement measures, including secondary sanctions against foreign entities that supply the island with critical resources.
With Venezuelan shipments disrupted, Mexico has quietly emerged as Cuba’s largest oil supplier, selling fuel rather than providing it as aid.
According to international energy data, imported fuel accounts for roughly 60% of Cuba’s oil consumption, making the island heavily dependent on foreign deliveries.
Fuel shortages have already worsened conditions on the ground, with long gas lines, rolling blackouts, and mounting public frustration across Cuban cities, according to the Daily Mail.
Senior administration officials argue that cutting off remaining oil flows would accelerate economic pressure and collapse the regime’s ability to govern.
Republican lawmakers have openly backed the strategy, signaling support for a no exceptions approach to Cuba’s energy supply.
Florida Sen. Rick Scott (R) recently said there should be no petroleum reaching Cuba under any circumstances, reflecting a growing consensus among hardliners.
While some officials have expressed concern over humanitarian consequences, proponents argue that the current moment presents a rare opportunity.
They point to a weakened economy, reduced foreign support, and growing unrest as signs that the regime can no longer withstand sustained pressure.
Trump has not yet publicly commented on the plan, but allies say the administration sees Cuba as the next front after Venezuela.
If approved, the oil blockade would represent one of the most aggressive U.S. actions against Havana since the Cold War.
Supporters believe the strategy could finally bring an end to a communist government that has ruled the island since 1959.
