SCOTUS Allows Pennsylvania to Count Contested Provisional Ballots

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected an emergency appeal from Republicans that could have led to thousands of provisional ballots not being counted in the battleground state.

The justices left in place a state Supreme Court ruling that elections officials must count provisional ballots cast by voters whose mail-in ballots were rejected.

As of Thursday, about 9,000 ballots out of more than 1.6 million returned have arrived at elections offices around Pennsylvania lacking a secrecy envelope, a signature or a date, according to state records.

Pennsylvania is the biggest presidential election battleground this year, with 19 electoral votes.

Former President Donald Trump won the state in 2016, then lost it in 2020.

It is one of the seven swing states, and is the one that could decide the outcome of one of the closest races in history.

Experts have called Pennsylvania the most likely tipping point state. It has 19 electoral votes.

In 2020, it was decided by about 80,000 votes.

The case dealt in part with ‘naked ballots,’ those without a security sleeve that gets included in mail ballots but which some voters may neglect to use.

The Republican National Committee said it could impact ‘tens of thousands of votes in a state which many anticipate could be decisive.’

Wrote Justice Samuel Alito, ‘even if we agreed with the applicants’ federal constitutional argument (a question on which I express no view at this time), we could not prevent the consequences they fear.’

There weren’t any dissents.

The Supreme Court’s rejection comes after an intervention by its conservative majority, off its ‘shadow docket’, that boosted the Republican position in Virginia.

That decision, which the court released without explanation, allowed the state to purge about about 1,600 people from its rolls just a week before the election.

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) argued it was necessary to block people who could be noncitizens. But the Justice Department opposed it, arguing that some people kicked off the roles might be eligible voters who simply filled out a form wrong.

SHARE THIS:
By Trent Walker

Trent Walker has over ten years experience as an undercover reporter, focusing on politics, corruption, crime, and deep state exposés.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Will Brame
Will Brame
1 month ago

The only way we will get tis country back is to FIGHT!!!!!!

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
1 month ago

WHAT are y’all THINKING? Or maybe the question should be WERE y’all thinking??? If the votes are questionable, they need to be verified as valid, before they get counted, or trashed if not! It’s the citizens job to insure he’s properly registered to be counted!

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x