Pfizer Employees Received ‘Special Batches’ of COVID Jabs That Were DIFFERENT From What the Public Got

According to company officials, not everyone who received the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ was administered identical mRNA injections.

During a recent legislative hearing in Australia, Pfizer executives revealed that staff members at the company received their own “special batches” of Fauci Flu shots that were different than the ones distributed to the general public.

“We’ve read that your [employee] vaccine mandate was using your own batch of vaccine especially imported for Pfizer, which was not tested by the TGA,” said Sen. Malcolm Roberts of the populist One Nation party, referring to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Australia’s equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“Is that correct?” Roberts then asked.

A Pfizer representative confirmed: “Uh, senator, so, Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines, especially for the employee vaccination program, and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that was being delivered to clinics as needed.”

Also when asked if anyone was fired from Pfizer for refusing to take its covid injections, company executives hemmed and hawed before stating that “a small number of colleagues departed the company” after refusing to get shot.

The hearing then dealt with the indemnity that Pfizer was granted by the Australian government – an indemnity that Pfizer employees refused to discuss.

Pfizer’s refusal to answer any questions about its indemnity agreement suggests that, just like in the United States, the drug giant is shielded from all liability for injuries or deaths caused by its poison injections.

They would not even confirm whether or not said indemnity agreement would be negative in the event that Pfizer is confirmed to have “committed a crime such as fraudulent treatment of trial data.”

One Pfizer representative did claim that the company “always abides by all of the laws and regulations of the markets in which it operates,” even though this is factually incorrect based on the billions of dollars the company has had to fork out in fines and settlements for illegally promoting drugs, making false claims, and committing other crimes.

In short, Pfizer is a shady company at best, which arranged special indemnification clauses attached to the unleashing of its covid injections, which we now know are highly deadly.

The company also produced one set of injections for its employees and another set for the general public.

WATCH:

Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.

SHARE THIS:
By Hunter Fielding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PithyKat
PithyKat
6 months ago

So glad the ‘news’ is catching up. Of course they received placeboes which is why, in several million deaths, we NEVER saw a ‘sudden mysterious death’ occur with a politician’s name attached to it. Doesn’t exactly take a Sherlock Holmes to figure this one out.

Next?

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x