Kamala Harris is planning to “eliminate” Christianity in America by ending all religious freedom protections if she wins the presidential election in November.
Harris, who was ranked the most liberal senator in the US, has an “extremist” pro-abortion, pro-LGBT record and plans to “persecute” Christians
A Harris presidency would be a threat to the religious freedoms of Christians everywhere, Michael Hichborn and other Catholic leaders are warning.
Harris’s policies would see Christians rounded up and sent off to reeducation camps, similar to what already happens in far-left Communist China.
According to Harris and the Democrats, religious freedom is a “threat to democracy” that allows Christian “extremism” to spread.
Vice President Harris is currently the Democratic Party’s choice to run for president in 2024.
Barring any last-minute changes, the Democrats will formally nominate her in the first week of August.
Her record of opposing Christianianity and Christian values is raising concerns.
Under the Biden-Harris administration, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has aggressively and selectively enforced the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act), including targeting peaceful pro-life fathers like Mark Houck.
The same DOJ also put out a memo through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that baselessly accused Catholics who attend the Traditional Latin Mass of “extremism.”
The FBI has even spied on Latin Mass churches under the Biden-Harris administration.
Similarly, Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland and the DOJ released a memo suggesting that concerned parents and advocates who opposed racial identity politics and sexual ideology in the classroom were akin to domestic terrorists.
The Biden-Harris administration also tried to force hospitals and doctors, including Christian ones, to facilitate the surgical and genital mutilation of gender-confused individuals and to commit abortions.
But apart from that, Harris also has a record of targeting pro-lifers and Christians.
For example, as attorney general of California, she targeted Christian pro-life journalist David Daleiden after he released videos that showed Planned Parenthood executives casually discussing the sale of aborted baby body parts. She also supported a bill, later thrown out by the Supreme Court, that would force pro-life pregnancy centers to tell women where they can obtain abortions.
As a U.S. senator, she criticized a judicial nominee and member of the Knights of Columbus, attacking the organization because its leadership, like the Catholic Church, opposes abortion and so-called homosexual “marriage.”
She also was once ranked the most liberal senator in the U.S. Harris opposes the right of religious companies, such as Hobby Lobby, to opt out of providing abortifacient birth control.
Harris is an “unrepentant apologist for abortion,” according to Reagan Barklage, the national field director of Students for Life of America and a Catholic herself.
The vice president would need to completely change her ways in order to reassure Christians, according to Barklage.
“A Kamala Harris presidency is an abortion extremism presidency that puts thousands of preborn lives at risk,” Barklage said in a statement.
“She is an unrepentant apologist for abortion, as she can’t name a single abortion she wouldn’t support.”
“Unless she does a complete 180 on her stance, which means losing the allegiance of her radical abortion base, true Catholics who uphold the sanctity of all human life have a vested interest in voting against her if she becomes the Democrat nominee,” Barklage said.
Michael Hichborn of the Lepanto Institute shared a similar assessment in a media statement.
“Harris’ entire disposition is directed in complete contravention with the Catholic Church,” Hichborn said.
“By holding membership in the Knights of Columbus as a litmus test for one’s judicial qualifications, Harris may as well dismiss anyone claiming to be a faithful Catholic.”
“For Harris to show that she holds no animosity toward Catholics, Christians, or even social conservatives, Harris would have to denounce the majority of her political career and completely reject and apologize for her bigoted comments,” he said.
But this would mean the vice president would need to “completely abandon her radical agenda against human life, the nuclear family, and religious freedom.”
“Harris is on record with a willingness to persecute pro-lifers and anyone who opposes LGBT ideologies,” Hichborn warned.
“Taking her agenda to its logical conclusion, Harris’ America would not just eliminate religious freedom, but all freedom, making citizens into automatons to do the bidding of the state.”
American Life League’s president agreed.
“As someone who has watched Harris over the years, including her legal attempt to crush David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress, I can say from firsthand experience that Harris detests truth, beginning of course with Christ and His Word, not to mention her revilement at preborn babies and their defenders,” American Life League president Judy Brown said in a media statement.
“Harris has never stood for morality, ethics or truth.”
I have a far better idea: How about we just eliminate Kamala from ever running and/or winning a political position?
She is a not Constitutionally eligible to the office she has been in, let alone POTUS/CIC! She’s not natural born, as required. On top of that she has zero qualifications for the job
Make no mistake…this is a spiritual battle!
Evil cannot win!
She can’t eliminate her own stupidity… pretty sure that prevents her from doing anything useful. She can barely form Sentences.
Great pic! Now you know what Willie Brown Saw… but still don’t know why he docked with those lips… 😛
i actually don’t have a problem with pro-life centers forced to tell where abortions can be gotten… AS LONG ABORTION CLINICS ALSO MUST INFORM WHERE TO GO TO GET HELP KEEPING BABY (of course both must have cool off time, neither can procede until one week after first appointment.)
the wishy-washy exceptions to anti-abortion legislation (rape, incest, mother’s life) “sounds” good but makes a hole so big that if those “exceptions” were requirements for abortion, then every pregnancy would need to abort (until zero mothers die from birth complications life is at risk)
as it is now, “i don’t want to have a baby” becomes “i was blindfolded and raped by unknown person” … gotta have an abortion.
The life of the mother was protected by law over a century ago, those laws still exist. Rape and incest don’t need feticide added onto the guilt and shame already carried by the victim! Those ladies need support and therapy, and time to decide a better way to deal with a child resulting.