FDA Commissioner Reveals: ‘Ivermectin Has No Benefit Against COVID-19’

On April 11, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared that ivermectin does not work at all against COVID-19.

This statement comes shortly after the FDA removed social media posts advising against the use of the drug for treating COVID-19.

“If you look at the randomized trials of ivermectin, and there’s many of them now, there is no benefit of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID,” Dr. Robert Califf said in Washington during a congressional hearing.

He also said there were risks to taking the drug.

The remarks followed closely on the heels of the FDA’s decision to take down posts labeling ivermectin as a medication for horses and advising against its use for COVID-19.

This move was part of a settlement with doctors who sued the agency over these posts and a webpage titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which was also removed.

“Why did you have to retract everything you said about ivermectin?” Rep. Paul Gosar asked Dr. Califf on Thursday.

“We didn’t retract everything we said about ivermectin,” Dr. Califf said.

That’s when he claimed no randomized clinical trials showed a benefit for ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.

“That’s a statement just in fact,” he said.

“And any drug for which there’s no benefit and there are risks, people have to make their own decisions about what to do. What we’re not doing is telling doctors what they have to do,” he continued.

Dr. Califf’s statements are false. Although certain randomized trials haven’t demonstrated a benefit for ivermectin, others have shown that individuals taking ivermectin fared better than those in control groups.

Dr. Janet Woodcock, who served as Dr. Califf’s predecessor, was more specific in her remarks regarding ivermectin when addressing the conflicting data.

“Ivermectin has been shown to be ineffective against COVID in large randomized trials,” she told The Epoch Times previously.

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“I would urge Dr. Califf to engage in debate with myself or other doctors who are actually treating COVID patients using ivermectin,” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors who sued the FDA, told The Epoch Times in a message on the social media platform X.

“Dr. Califf has zero hands-on, clinical experience and is somehow ignorant of the 102 peer-reviewed studies showing efficacy of ivermectin in COVID patients. Further, if he would take the time to refer to the FDA’s own data, he might understand how safe ivermectin is,” she added.

Ivermectin is FDA-approved for specific purposes, such as treating strongyloidiasis, an illness caused by roundworms. In the United States, doctors have the authority to prescribe medications approved for one condition to treat another condition, which they frequently do.

Dr. Califf, FDA commissioner since 2022, has been vocal against misinformation, claiming it’s a leading cause of death without providing data to support the assertion.

During a confrontation with Rep. Eric Burlinson, he defended the FDA’s stance on ivermectin, despite criticism of the agency’s portrayal of the drug as solely for animals.

Dr. Califf stated that while ivermectin is used in animals, it’s also widely used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize. He reiterated the FDA’s position that there’s insufficient evidence to support its efficacy against COVID-19.

The FDA’s recent legal settlement required removal of webpages and social media posts about ivermectin but left open the possibility for a revised page.

The new FDA statement emphasizes that ivermectin hasn’t been authorized for COVID-19 treatment and advises healthcare professionals to use approved drugs judiciously.

Share your thoughts by scrolling down to leave a comment.

By Hunter Fielding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Traveler9546
Traveler9546
1 month ago

Both Woodcock and Califf are ignorant morons. How they got the title of Doctor, is questionable. IV has no side effects and does stop covid when used early enough and properly. These two must be removed from office and loss of medical license forever. They definitely do not need to be part of the FDA and CDC spewing lies and misinformation!

;^)
;^)
1 month ago
Reply to  Traveler9546

Nuremberg 2.0!

;^)
;^)
1 month ago

NYQUIL is best for the FLU.
COVID was just the normal FLU Season, weaponized by media to instill fear! Then, the side effects kicked in!
Do you see the insidious plan? Do you trust those who created this nightmare to be good little caring humans from now on?
Why are they still free?

Giterdun
Giterdun
1 month ago

I think what he actually means is that Ivermectin has no benefit against the MRNA vaccines, which “Covid-19” is really just another name for.

Graham Booker
Graham Booker
1 month ago

On April 11, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared that ivermectin does not work at all against COVID-19.

So it replicates the mRNA jabs you pushed then. Is there anyone on the planet that still believes these snake oil salesmen?

Last edited 1 month ago by Phylis Tein
mykie133
mykie133
1 month ago

So, based on what we now know, it it safe to presume that IVM will be uber-effective against Disease X, whenever it’s launched? Think mirror-image……

georgeOh
georgeOh
1 month ago

THIS GUY IS NUTS or EVIL. Either way, we would be better off not listening to him.

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x