Doctors Now Prioritizing ‘Climate Change’ over Patients’ Health

According to a world-renowned medical journal, doctors are now prioritizing “climate change” over their own patients’ health.

The peer-reviewed British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an editorial calling on doctors around the world to shift their professional focus.

The BMJ wants all medical professional to redirect their focus away from patient care and onto climate change.

According to the journal, doctors everywhere are already on board with the radical agenda.

Just ahead of the COP26 gathering in Glasgow back in 2021, the BMJ op-ed was released to seed the medical profession with the myth that caring for patients contributes significantly to “greenhouse gas emissions,” the suggestion being that patients should simply be allowed to die in order to “save the planet.”

Only if “health professionals” can learn how to reduce “overdiagnosis” and “overtreatment” can the medical profession at large adapt to a changing climate, the editorial claims, suggesting that letting more patients die will help to “cool” the planet and prevent it from “warming.”

“Let’s get this straight: The medical establishment wants to cut back on diagnosing cancer early in order to save Big Ben from disappearing under 100-foot waves a week on Wednesday,” writes Vernon Coleman about the ridiculousness of the editorial’s position.

“This is terrifyingly wicked.”

Increasing rates of chronic illness due to genetically modified organisms (GMOs), vaccines, 5G, and other societal poisons are to take a back seat to the mythical concept of climate change, the medical establishment now claims, arguing that “the climate emergency is the true health crisis of our time.”

Amazingly, the same BMA that published the above-linked editorial also claims that Great Britain needs 60,000 more doctors – for what, we would ask, if climate change is the true priority?

Perhaps the goal of bringing in more doctors to the National Health Service (NHS), the United Kingdom’s government-controlled health care system, is to use them as Dr. Kevorkian types to get rid of patients in order to “save the planet?”

Coleman would seem to agree, having written in a recent piece that the medical profession of today at large “is complicit in the government’s attack on the people it is paid to serve” – especially since the government has made it abundantly clear that it “does not want older, experienced, independent-minded doctors working in Britain,” he says.

No, what the government of the UK wants is a new army of fake medical professionals who will obey every anti-human order passed down to them by their overlords, all in the name of protecting the planet against greenhouse gas destruction.

In fact, the General Medical Council (GMC) has made it a point to drive out the older, more experienced doctors so they can be replaced with a new breed of medical lackeys, “thereby making it easier to destroy the NHS, to kill vast numbers of elderly and sick patients and to push through the rebranded flu hoax and the associated fraud involving an experimental injection.”

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“Maybe the Government realised that older, more experienced doctors, not bound by an NHS contract, without mortgages to pay and without future careers to worry about, might be more likely to question the whole rebranded flu hoax,” Coleman further writes in his newest book, “Truth Teller: The Price.”

“It is noteworthy that most of the few doctors objecting to the fraud have been older and more experienced physicians.”

The very idea of “net zero,” which is being heavily pushed right now throughout the West, implies the near-total eradication of human beings from the planet.

This aligns with the Agenda 2030 plan to massively depopulate the world, leaving behind a much smaller slave class to serve the globalists’ every whim.

By Hunter Fielding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Antidote
Antidote
6 months ago

I’m thinking bailing Britain’s arse out in WW the second was a waste.

michael savell
michael savell
6 months ago
Reply to  Antidote

2 things,you lent GB money to continue a war being waged on Europe.GB had not been declared war on by Germany and had,in fact been promised huge gains for staying neutral,but it didn”t as it had real men those days.You charged us disproportionate rates of interest that took us about 80years to pay back.Furthermore you came into the war when it was nearly over when Japan had been defeated in Manchuria and Germany un Russia so you could say you came for the pickings not for freedom.
Secondly,all this WEF business all started in the USA and with it climate change and you also gave us Covid and you have done exactly zilch about any of it.You can’t even arrest world population killers or those who have decided you are to become part of Europe.

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
6 months ago
Reply to  Antidote

I’m having 2nd thoughts about all of Europe, China from that 1, and “freeing the slaves” in the 1860s too…

PithyKat
PithyKat
6 months ago

Vast amounts of time, money and expertise to improve our health, longevity, and ‘happiness’ by our scientists and the medical field – all for nothing (except making money). Now they say we’re living too long and in that process, are destroying the planet with zero supportive facts. So, who did what to whom? The scientists? The Medical Field? The victims? Kinda contradictory and self-defeating, no? Let’s call a spade a spade and stop all the finger-pointing – the goal is to depopulate the planet – but NOT including the ‘elites’ in any shape, manner or form.

Eli Goldstein
Eli Goldstein
6 months ago
Reply to  PithyKat

The same people who aay the earth is overpopulated want to save your life?

thk
John
John
6 months ago

Don’t care!

Wouldn’t visit a medical facility unless i boke a bone, got stabed or shot!!!

Don’t trust doctors as far as I can spit on them.

Last edited 6 months ago by John
michael savell
michael savell
6 months ago
Reply to  John

In England our problem is that we just do not have enough doctors because we are losing them to other country’s now,even Rwanda is ahead of us but,due to EU laws we must still take legal and illegal migrants.There are so many of these that they have bunged our
medical practice up.Consequently it is getting harder to even see a doctor which is why
some blackhearts are suggesting reducing the standard of care for older people

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
6 months ago
Reply to  michael savell

They started that back in the ’80s by reports I was reading back then. What was the excuse then?

Eli Goldstein
Eli Goldstein
6 months ago

All of it planned and controlled by the NWO globalists.

abram-pritzker-was-one-of-three-brothers-who-inher
Asstro Buoy
Asstro Buoy
6 months ago

If the medical community is falling for this they’ll fall for anything. Drugs cure disease, anyone?

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
6 months ago
Reply to  Asstro Buoy

No, they do not; they TREAT going, chronic problems; not the same thing. In fact, during illness is contrary to the aim of the medical and pharmaceutical businesses. They want to make money; that requires repeat business…

Robert P
Robert P
6 months ago

THIS COMPLETE AND TOTAL FRAUD HAS TO STOP!!!

Sandra Smith
Sandra Smith
6 months ago

You think that’s new??? You’ve been comatose since the ’90s???

Bob
Bob
6 months ago

If your doctor brings up climate change in an office visit, find another doctor.

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x