Data Analyst Uncovers GPS Data Linking Chicago Protesters to Multiple Demonstrations

“It’s really hard to overstate just how different the environment is for Democrats now,” The New York Times’ Maya King proclaimed from a “boisterous rally” for Harris in Atlanta, where Kamala was joined by rappers Megan Thee Stallion and Quavo of Migos.

“It’s the clearest illustration yet of just how different the Democratic presidential campaign is under Harris — and how much she’s energizing a part of the Democratic coalition that had been checked out,” King fawned.

Over and over again, the same tired argument: Look at the energy! The vibes! The lines!

This woman lost every swing state and the popular vote. How? She had vibes. She had crowds. She had energy. Or so it looked that way, anyhow.

For those of you who do have the attention span of sparrows, meanwhile, you may have heard that there were huge, giant, massive protests in American cities against President Donald Trump and Department of Government Efficiency chair Elon Musk this past weekend:

And this comes after Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez drew huge crowds to their “Fighting Oligarchy” rallies:

Such energy! Such vibes! Such huge crowds! I’m halfway shocked that Maya King isn’t out there saying how “it’s really hard to overstate just how different the environment is for Democrats now.”

If you’re wondering why vibes don’t equal votes, however, you may want to pay attention to entrepreneur and data expert Tony Seruga. He’s been taking a look at these crowds via GPS data — and, surprise surprise, it looks like they’ve been inflating things.

Take the “MASSIVE protest” in downtown Chicago, for instance, that took place this weekend. According to Seruga, while organizers claimed 30,000 people, GPS only detected 7,498 mobile devices in the area.

What’s more, when Seruga broke that number down, it looked a lot worse. He used demographic data — “age, gender, income, education level,” that sort of thing — and psychographic data, which “dives deeper into people’s lifestyles, values, attitudes, interests, personality traits, social class, activities, and how they make purchasing decisions.”

“For more insight into what data we also look at in addition to GPS location data would be demographic and psychographic data using over 6,000 different databases, i.e., like the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Pew Research Center, market research firms like YouGov, Experian, specialized tools like ESRI’s Tapestry Segmentation, consumer surveys, social media platforms like 𝕏, Facebook, Linkedin,” he added in a Saturday evening post to X.

“Additionally, by cross pollinating each device with other devices regularly within close proximity to the target device we are able to build a detailed profile for each target,” he said, adding that he had identified six groups that were behind driving turnout to these events: “Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project, Troublemakers, the Democratic Socialists of America and the Muslim Brotherhood.”

“We have also identified 11 additional groups paying for protests, demonstrations and riots, many are linked to foreign bad actors in countries funding terrorism,” he alleged.

As for those detected via GPS, 92 percent were identified “having attended 5 or more Kamala Harris rallies, antifa/blm, pro-Hamas, [or] pro-Palestinian protests.”

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Now, it’s worth noting that we don’t have access to his dataset, but it’s also worth noting that this isn’t the first time he’s seen inflated turnout numbers and signs that this wasn’t exactly grassroots enthusiasm. Guess where else he found it?

SHARE THIS:
By Trent Walker

Trent Walker has over ten years experience as an undercover reporter, focusing on politics, corruption, crime, and deep state exposés.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x