Canada to Expand ‘Assisted Suicide’ Laws to Euthanize Infants for Profit

The far-left Canadian is expanding the country’s “assisted suicide” laws to include infants, allowing doctors to euthanize young children for profit.

The move is being championed by Canadian doctor Louis Roy.

Roy called on Canada’s liberal government to relax the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) laws so that doctors can use euthanasia to end the lives of infants.

However, critics warn that an infant is not capable of making life and death decisions, meaning it cannot be “assisted dying” as people have been led to believe is what MAiD is intended for – it is state-sanction infanticide so the MAiD death cult can exploit the selling of children’s organs.

An infant is not self-aware and cannot “commit suicide.”

Infants want to live, eat, and be held by their parents.

And yet, the Canadian government, under the recommendation of the Quebec College of Physicians, wants to expand the Canadian “Medical Assistance in Dying” program to infants.

Watch Dr. Louis Roy, from the Quebec College of Physicians, telling the Commons’ Special Joint Committee of Medical Assistance in Dying (“MAiD”) on 7 October 2022 that his organization believes MAID can be appropriate for infants up to age one who are born with “severe malformations.”

Medical Assistance in Dying implies someone wanting to die and getting medical assistance to die in a socially approved manner with some comfort.

Infants under one year cannot possibly choose to die or request medical assistance, so the name does not exactly suit the situation. Instead of “assistance in dying,” infants will be euthanised for the convenience of the parents and doctors who no longer want to deal with problematic babies.

There are other, even more disturbing reasons for this program being promoted, which we will explore.

Canada’s National Post has the details.

Quebec’s College of Physicians proposal attempts to sound sensible by referring to babies who suffer from “unbearable pain,” with euthanasia approved by a doctor and consented to by both parents.

Get The Free News Addicts Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

However, it is unclear how custodial situations would be handled, and “both parents’ consent” would be disregarded in the case of non-married parents.

The Quebec College of Physicians thinks adults can decide which infants to euthanize.

A supposed “safeguard” requires a physician’s approval in any decision to euthanize infants.

Will it protect infants from ill-considered euthanasia decisions?

Not necessarily. Consider Dr. Green, a MAiD enthusiast who loves providing and advocates for euthanasia.

Dr. Green has already euthanized over 300 people, and she loves her job!

She is pictured here, holding an uncomfortable-looking infant:

Per CTV News, 11 April 2022:

Dr. Stefanie Green found her calling and is not feeling burned out – quite the opposite – experiencing intense emotions administering euthanasia to her patients.

What are the chances that doctors such as Dr. Green, who love the intense emotions they experience from euthanasing people, would safeguard the lives of infants? You tell me.

The infants who will be euthanized by the likes of Dr. Stefanie Green are not considered valuable enough to live. However, they have valuable organs that could be harvested and given to more deserving children.

While euthanasia is not a well-paying procedure, performed often by enthusiastic doctors like Dr. Green, who experience intense emotions that they value, organ transplantation is a thriving and big-money business benefiting doctors, surgeons, and hospitals.

Does the opportunity to harvest organs from an infant who cannot object to his or her euthanasia present ethical problems?

Is there an unsolvable conflict of interest?

If tired parents of a sickly child, exhausted from sleepless nights and medical expenses, visit a doctor like Stefanie Green, I expect that MAiD euthanasia will likely be approved and quickly performed.

The parents may initially feel relieved.

The hospital performing the euthanasia will make money on harvested organs.

In the future, though, the parents may have more sleepless nights full of bad dreams about their euthanized baby that they agreed to kill.

So, we have to ask, can we judge an infant and say with certainty that this infant deserves to die due to their sickness?

How do we know which infants are hopeless?

Do you know anyone who was born very sick and with health problems who then went on to live a productive life?

Would we be better off if sick children were euthanized for profit?

SHARE THIS:
By Hunter Fielding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
elizabethrc
elizabethrc
5 months ago

This is the latest part of the world’s elites’ plans for you and me and now even our babies but that’s not all. They want to get money for their murder. That is, after all, what this is.
I have a suggestion for them: let us all send our growing illegal criminal populations there and let them euthanize them and charge the countries from which they came? Short of that, how about arresting the politicians who vote this into law and do the same for them?

Last edited 5 months ago by elizabethrc
Sink
Sink
5 months ago
CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 months ago
Reply to  Sink

Patriots should do that…..quickly!

Dave Coleman
Dave Coleman
5 months ago

Maybe the intense emotions felt by Dr. Green include satisfaction at helping to end her patients’ unmanageable/incurable suffering. As for babies, yes of course they cannot make life or death decisions. Does that mean they must endure terrible suffering until they die “naturally”? Pet dogs cannot make decisions about life and death either, but we consider a pet owner that keeps his suffering animal alive to be cruel. Why then is it not cruel to keep a suffering baby alive? Are babies less worthy of compassion and a dignified death than an animal?

PithyKat
PithyKat
5 months ago
Reply to  Dave Coleman

I worked in a residential drug rehab home for moms and their young children – I’ve heard of a ton of abuse – physically, emotionally, spiritually, and intelligently being done both to the moms and their babies by the men in their lives. If someone brings in a ‘damaged’ baby that was deliberately physically abused (such as held by the feet and smashed against the wall) by its sperm donor, does that baby now fall within this policy to be euthanized as well? Is that really the best we can do?

Cary Ke
Cary Ke
5 months ago

The huge problem with euthanasia is once the proper documentation is completed then causing a person’s death is legal. There are no checks and balances that the documentation and patient are jointly considered by an independant third party to ensure the documents are factual. There is no correcting a mistake once the patient is killed. There should be a court examination prior to granting permission. There should be an audit and review procedure done annually to ensure the prescribed procedures are strictly followed. Ensuring infants are kept pain free is a long way from taking their life. Anyone who gets an emotional thrill from the process should not be involved instead they should be investigated.

Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
5 months ago
Reply to  Cary Ke

There are no checks and balances that the documentation and patient are jointly considered by an independant third party to ensure the documents are factual.

I have not checked the changes to the legislation, but the original legislation went well beyond what you suggest. A family member opted for this after cancer treatments failed. Not only was there an independent review of the medical file and diagnosis, there had to be an assessment that the person was of sound mind, and the consent was witnessed by two people unknown to the medical staff, who would perform the procedure, and the patient.
Having worked in a hospital, I saw “heroic” attempts by pediatricians to save “premies” at gestation periods as low as 30 weeks. Many survived, but below 33 weeks lung development is incomplete. Of the ones that survived, it was not uncommon for them to spend long periods of time in the hospital. I recall one girl, who died before age 6, spending almost half her life in and out of hospital. Yes, she was a bright girl, but her level of quality of life was very low, as she was bedridden for most of her life and often needed mechanical ventilation to keep her alive. When it comes to infants and children, things are never black and white.

I am aware the mentally ill are now “eligible”. Under the old legislation, they would automatically have been excluded for not being of sound mind.

Annoying Truther
Annoying Truther
5 months ago

This is really really sick. This is coming from jews. The article doesn’t really cover if these infants are just unwanted or if they have severe birth defects. I know this is from jews because Shitrael kills Palestinians every day to sell their organs. One of their crimes our CONgressman ignore. If they are talking about birth defects so bad the kid won’t have a normal life and will be hooked up to some machine all his life then I could get behind this but being they want to make money selling organs I think they want to kill as many infants as possible. This is a communistic activity as both Shitrael and China sell organs of prisoners, mainly to rich jews. I’ve heard China takes the organs out while the prisoner is still alive. It has to be one of the most horrible deaths imaginable. Do they plan on doing the same to infants or are they going to kill them first.

PithyKat
PithyKat
5 months ago

Pure, unadulturated racist bullshyt.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 months ago

NAZI Dr. Josef Rudolf Mengele lives again!

NanaMonster
NanaMonster
5 months ago

I’ve seen how they target the mentally ill, homeless and aged but this is the sickest thing yet!!

ItsJo
ItsJo
5 months ago

Justin Trudeau is “Beyond Belief in HIS doing his Master’s Bidding of the WEF, Klaus Schwab-Founder, members like Soros, etal. who ALL want to become the World’s Ruling Class, and have ‘put in place, younger leaders like Trudeau of Canada, Macron of France, Pete Buttigieg of USA, etc. as their New, Younger Leaders to replace these EGO MANIACS-that no one has elected, but like Bill Gates, they too believe in “DEPOPULATION” and that the privedged get to Live and in a Not so crowded world that would interfere with these ‘rulers’….This is Sick and so is Trudeau and the rest of these Maniacs. Let them off themselves and their families IF they think the world is too crowded-Setting an example for what they are spewing. Also in that list is the Arrogant, Money-Hungry, John Clod Kerry who just came out with HIS SAME THOUGHTS ON ‘ELITISTS’ THAT SHOULD LIVE AND OTHERS SHOULD DIE…,.He is the Climate Czar, that blames People for the Hoax-Climate Change and Global Warming(that WAS disputed) so they changed the name to CC…..It’s just their Slush Fund as they want to tax every person in the world w/their “Climate Tax”….Gee, follow the Money Hungry and see this plan they’ve hatched!!!

Dolyce Brown
Dolyce Brown
5 months ago

I am sickened by this terrible thing that Canada is doing. Canada is the leading country for murdering people by euthanasia aka MAID. Just looking at the picture of that awful doctor who loves killing people gives me chills. This has to stop. I hope and pray that when the wonderful day comes that we are rid of Trudeau et al, that the new government will revoke these dreadful laws.

John
John
5 months ago

Just lettimg you know, this site censors Truth!
They have removed many of my comments!

H F
H F
5 months ago

Infanticide was repealed from the Criminal Code in June 2019, so what do you expect, this was coming.

Elric
Elric
5 months ago

The Gates of Hell have been pushed ajar and vacuous filth like Turdeau are doing the bidding of their demonic masters.
Obviously no one has bothered to mention to these nefarious grubs that every single soul will be held to account for their deeds and that eternity means forever.

Manda
Manda
5 months ago

This is disgusting, if anyone stands with this they deserve to be dragged out into the street and shot with the rest of the deep state and leftards they stand with. I cannot believe this is how far GOD’S people have fallen. People need to turn to GOD and ask for forgiveness for such horrendous crimes against humanity.

LtJ
LtJ
5 months ago

Notice how quickly this ramped up after Canadians were disarmed!

oldbat
oldbat
5 months ago

anyone else see the demon in his eyes?

Asstro Buoy
Asstro Buoy
5 months ago

That’s another thing about this. How do we not know they are doing this for UDDER nefarious purposes?

arizona
arizona
5 months ago

IF there were any men in canada ,ALL THESE GOVERNMENT DEVILS WOULD BE HANGED ..but lucky them ,there are no men,so the women in the EPHAH are doing the job of SATAN…ALL YOU FOOLS in canada will soon be leaving this world,I HOPE YOU REALIZE WHERE YOU”LL BE GOING,and you won’t have a millstone around your neck ,IT WILL BE MUCH WORSE…

PithyKat
PithyKat
5 months ago

Why is there silence from the pro-llife crowd? It’s okay to kill an infant that’s been born but not one still in the womb? I don’t get the hypocrisy.

22
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x