Recent signs of discord within Iran’s governing bodies raise concerns that any agreements with the U.S. may not last. Reports suggest that hardline factions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are advocating for a more aggressive stance towards President Donald Trump.
Media voices connected to the IRGC indicate a readiness for renewed conflict as opposed to a sustainable diplomatic approach. While some clerics and political figures might be open to negotiations, their support is limited and does not signify an overall shift in the regime’s stance.
This division could be pivotal.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps wields significant power in Iran, overseeing elite military units, missile programs, intelligence operations, and substantial economic resources. Even if civilian leaders publicly promote diplomacy, analysts argue that the IRGC tends to favor a confrontational stance towards the United States.
Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg remarked on Fox News that Iran’s leadership seems severely fragmented, with various power centers vying for control. He emphasized that, while the IRGC is influential, Iran’s conventional army also plays a vital role and functions independently from the Guard Corps.
WATCH:
🚨 WOW! The IRGC reportedly wants WAR with Donald Trump to resume
“Iranian officials and IRGC affiliated media signal readiness for the imminent resumption of war.”
The support for negotiations is not “UNIFIED” within the regime. A MAJOR power struggle is happening.
Sounds… pic.twitter.com/p9ROUv83KG
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 22, 2026
“The IRGC possesses weaponry, but so does the army, which is distinct from the IRGC,” Kellogg clarified.
He also mentioned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian as a relatively moderate figure, pointing out that he has been marginalized by more extreme factions. The focus has shifted to Ahmad Vahidi, who is gaining prominence in military strategy and planning.
Pezeshkian stated on Monday that “Deep historical mistrust in Iran towards U.S. government actions persists. Unconstructive signals from American officials convey a harsh message: they aim for Iran’s submission. Iranians are not inclined to yield to force.”
Trump has maintained a forceful approach towards Tehran, demanding a cohesive proposal for negotiations. Concurrently, U.S. pressure persists in the Strait of Hormuz, despite a temporary lull in hostilities.
MORE: Iranian officials and IRGC-affiliated media are signaling readiness for the imminent resumption of war.
Some senior Iranian clerical and political figures have expressed support for negotiations and for the negotiating team, but this support remains limited and does not… https://t.co/6ytbQkQfqg pic.twitter.com/ZDXocBx0Zq
— Institute for the Study of War (@TheStudyofWar) April 22, 2026
The ceasefire’s tenuous nature was evident when Iranian forces captured two commercial ships, even after the truce had been extended. This incident raises new questions about the durability of diplomacy if military factions in Iran continue to test boundaries.
For hardliners in the IRGC, Trump’s demands may reinforce their longstanding belief that any compromise leads to greater pressure. Such dynamics might bolster voices in Tehran advocating for missile strikes, increased military engagement, or a protracted standoff rather than yielding to concessions.
Iran’s political landscape is notoriously intricate, comprising overlapping institutions, rival factions, and diverse interests. Not every official favors outright conflict with the United States, especially considering the economic repercussions and military hazards a direct war entails.
While Trump seeks noticeable action from Tehran, factions connected to the IRGC are reportedly inclined towards resistance and pressure approaches. Neither side appears willing to appear weak, leaving the ceasefire vulnerable to future provocations.
RELATED: GOP Congressman Missing From DC Due To ‘Unspecified’ Medical Issue
